Skip to main content

Jakarta EE Platform Call

Date: 2020-03-31

Present:

  • Kevin Sutter (IBM)
  • Jonathan Gallimore (Tomitribe)
  • Andy McCright (IBM)
  • BJ Hargrave (IBM)
  • Bill Shannon (Oracle)
  • Brian Stansberry (Red Hat)
  • Ivar Grimstad (Eclipse Foundation)
  • Tanja Obradovic (Eclipse Foundation)
  • Scott Marlow (Red Hat)
  • Alessio Soldano (Red Hat)
  • Dmitry Kornilov (Oracle)
  • Ryan Cuprak (Dassault)
  • Ed Brtt (Oracle)
  • Steve Millidge (Payara)
  • Jonathan Coustick (Payara)
  • Kenji Kazumura (Fujitsu)
  • Scott Stark (Red Hat)
  • Werner Keil (Individual)

Agenda

XML Schema Discussion [BS]

  • https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1cCGLYsCVz9pkUnMCdwaiLraepcxuemMbmUymgdMKUQY/edit#gid=0
  • Where/how to publish implementation-specific schemas? [BS]
    • Suggestion: Add implementation specific namespaces under https://jakarta.ee/xml/ns/ [IG]
    • Use a separate url for the implementation-specific schemas (ie. glassfish). Something like https://org.eclipse/xml/ns
    • Ivar will follow up with the EF to see if a separate url/repo can be setup for the implementation-specific schemas.
  • Who’s handling Enterprise Web Services (JSR 109) schemas? [BS]
    • Need to update https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jax-ws-api/issues/98 with this request. Request for IBM to drive since they originally owned this JSR 109 spec.
  • FYI, also JAXB schemas here. [BS]
    • Lukas has already started moving on this request…
  • New suggestion for Schemas at https://jakarta.ee/xml/ns/jakartaee/: https://deploy-preview-700–jakartaee.netlify.com/schemas/ [IG]
    • Ivar will add some introductory text like the xmlns.jcp.org
    • Subpage per sub-namespace. Or, perhaps divide up this one page with multiple namespaces. Need to experiment with the layouts.
    • jaxb and jaxws namespaces should change to something else
  • This came up on https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-tck/pull/175, should this be raised on a ml or discussed here?
    • We can send mail if that makes more sense.
    • Also posted to the PMC mailing list: https://www.eclipse.org/lists/ee4j-pmc/msg02598.html
  • When updating TCK source for EE 9, should we follow existing convention?
    • GlassFish copyright tool could be used.
  • Or follow Eclipse formatting for Copyright dates.
  • Keep following Eclipse formatting: [, ]
  • All existing Oracle Copyright statements in the code should be left intact.
  • Except when updating the for the jakarta.* namespace update.
  • If new content is being provided, then an additional Copyright can be inserted citing the organization, individual, or the Eclipse Foundation as contributors. Follow the conventions outlined in the Eclipse Handbook.
  • Need to find a proper location to document this…

Transformer Project update [BJ]

  • https://projects.eclipse.org/proposals/eclipse-transformer
  • https://projects.eclipse.org/proposals (all proposals, if you are interested)
  • Moving forward with proposal. BJ needs to check with Wayne (EMO) on the next steps of publishing this for a vote.
  • Werner asked about IDE updates for the jakarta namespace update -Tanja and Ivar provided an update. Not much progress on this front. Jakarta EE Steering Committee is helping to drive this request.

Back to the top