Date: 2020-04-14
Present:
- BJ Hargrave (IBM)
- Werner Keil (Individual)
- Dmitry Kornilov (Oracle)
- Bill Shannon (Oracle)
- Kevin Sutter (IBM)
- Nitin Dahyabhai (WTP)
- Paul Nicolucci (IBM)
- Scott Stark (Red Hat)
- Ed Bratt (Oracle)
- Kenji Kazumura (Fujitsu)
- Rudy De Busscher (Payara)
- Martijn Verburg (LJC)
- Scott Marlow (Red Hat)
- Emily Jiang (IBM)
- Andy McCright (IBM)
- Scott Kurz (IBM)
- Nathan Erwin (Eclipse Contributor, Independent)
- Ivar Grimstad (Eclipse Foundation)
Agenda
[WK] Namespace
As we had a couple of discussions and action items like (XML) schema, what would be the impact if a future Jakarta EE version added new namespaces like “org.eclipse.x” in addition to the current “jakarta” namespace?
Minutes:
- Ivar demo’d https://jakarta.ee/schemas/ and the associated namespaces
- The comment from Werner about future namespaces such as org.eclipse.microprofile was recognized, but tabled until it becomes an issue in the future.
- In general, implementation specific namespaces (ie. glassfish) still need to be investigated. Ivar volunteered to follow up with this action.
- There have been PRs like https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/openmq/pull/497 in some spec or impl (“CI” as “Compatible - - Implementation” here) projects asking to use Travis-CI. Is there a strategy or coordinated effort regarding CI build pipelines?
Minutes:
- Is there anything preventing the use of Travis as a backup CI? No.
Jenkins is required to do the release processing. But, other CI mechanisms can be used on a per-project basis.
Kevin asked for the current status for Activation, Mail, Bean Validation and Batch. Seems to be very close to draft PR.
Minutes:
- Dmitry gave a status of all the specs led by Oracle
- Bean Validation dependent on Hibernate Validator and WELD (CDI). Still tests to fix. When CDI is released, BV can move forward.
