Skip to main content
Breadcrumbs
Date: 2021-10-19
Present:
- Ivar Grimstad (Eclipse Foundation)
- Kevin Sutter (IBM)
- BJ Hargrave (IBM)
- John Clingan (Red Hat)
- Emily Jiang (IBM)
- Scott Stark (Red Hat)
- Scott Marlow (Red Hat)
- Thomas Watson (IBM)
- Jesse McConnell (Webtide)
- Tomas Langer (Oracle)
- Lukas Jungmann (Oracle)
- Dmitry Kornilov (Oracle)
- Jean-Louis Monteiro (Tomitribe)
- Scott Kurz (IBM)
- Roberto Cortez (Red Hat)
- Cesar Hernandez (Tomitribe)
Agenda and Minutes
Jakarta EE 10 Status (standing agenda item)
- 14 specs have responded the status request form
- What does this mean for the remaining?
- Action - Ivar: Reach out to project leads and remind to submit the form or initiate release reviews
- Start tracking tighter, push for release reviews and ratification
- Monthly TCK calls
Discuss module-info testing requirements
- What if any requirements are needed for non-project implementations?
- Are there any TCK/signature test requirements and who is signing up to do them?
- Spec committee needs to define any ratification requirements.
- Spec committee will define this
- Does it exist?
- Is it readable?
- Discussion:
- No requirement for vendors to include a module-info in their product
- Up to each project to determine what they want to test
- Packages exist, typos etc.
- Scott will respond on the mailing list and update the wiki
Need common annotations release plan or argue for service release
- https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-platform/issues/423
- https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/common-annotations-api/issues/92
- The project currently lacks project lead
- Dmitry will help:
- Create release plan for 2.1 (PR)
- Create the release 2.1
Issues created for service releases needed for adding module-info to specs not doing a release for EE10.
- Encourage these projects to do a SR ASAP
Back to the top