Skip to main content

Jakarta EE Platform Call

Date: 2022-02-15

Present:

  • Jan Westerkamp (iJUG)
  • BJ Hargrave (IBM)
  • Tom Watson (IBM)
  • Jared Anderson (IBM)
  • Ivar Grimstad (Eclipse Foundation)
  • Scott Stark (Red Hat)
  • John Clingan (Red Hat)
  • Tomas Langer (Oracle)
  • Lukas Jungmann (Oracle)
  • Petr Aubrecht (Payara)
  • Dmitry Kornilov (Oracle)
  • Emily Jiang (IBM)
  • Jesse McConnell (Webtide)
  • Tanja Obradovic (Eclipse Foundation)
  • Brian Stansberry (Red Hat)
  • Nathan Erwin (Individual)
  • Scott Marlow (Red Hat)
  • Kenji Kazumura (Fujitsu)

Agenda and Minutes

Jakarta EE 10 Status (standing agenda item)

  • Work continues on TCKs

  • Enterprise-beans module-info: https://github.com/jakartaee/enterprise-beans/pull/141

  • Still need draft PRs:
    • Jakarta Messaging 3.1 - Has RC, no issues remaining?
    • Jakarta JSON Binding 3.0 - TCK?
      • Working on small issue with platform TCK
      • Only remaining issue
      • On track for Feb 28
    • Jakarta Authorization 2.1 - 2 issues that do not seem to be addressable for EE10 at this point.
    • Jakarta Standard Tag Library 3.0 - Resolving last issues
    • Jakarta Connectors 2.1 - RC put out, seems to be one spec related issue
    • Jakarta Security 3.0 - Created issue to triage remaining issues into an EE10 set
      • https://github.com/jakartaee/security/issues/205
    • Jakarta Faces 4.0 - working on TCK
  • Action item for all spec projects: Create the draft PR and release (milestones) of API artifacts \

TCK Packaging

  • Release of JAR to Maven Central?

  • How to “track” this file? List SHA-1 (as is used by Maven Central)?

  • Spec committee only track the ZIP file (with SHA256)
    • This signed binary must be referenced when implementations claim compatibility
  • Jsonp tck provides zip

  • For EE 10, the current requirement of producing a ZIP file with associated SHA-256 stands

  • Action:
    • Check with EF if releasing TCK artifacts dual licensed (EFTL+EPL2) to Maven Central is ok (Ivar)
    • ZIP file has EFTL only today. Is it ok to publish EFTL-only licensed artifacts to Maven Central?
  • Get clarifications on next spec committee call
    • Scott will draft a proposal
    • Jakarta EE TCK process may have to be updated \

Updates needed for

Update on jQAssistant report issue with Nexus Staging repo for Jakarta EE 10.0.0-RC1:

Back to the top