Skip to main content

Jakarta EE Platform Call

Date: 2022-05-17 Present:

  • Jan Westerkamp (iJUG)
  • Jesse McConnell (Webtide)
  • Emily Jiang (IBM)
  • Jared Anderson (IBM)
  • Jim Krueger (IBM)
  • Nathan Rauh (IBM)
  • Tom Watson (IBM)
  • Ivar Grimstad (Eclipse Foundation)
  • Scott Marlow (Red Hat)
  • Scott Stark (Red Hat)
  • Brian Stansberry (Red Hat)
  • John Clingan (Red Hat)
  • Ed Bratt (Oracle)
  • Lukas Jungmann (Oracle)
  • Arjan Tijms (OmniFaces / Piranha)
  • Petr Aubrecht (Payara)
  • Nathan Erwin (Individual)
  • Werner Keil (Individual)

Agenda and Minutes

Jakarta EE 10 Status (standing agenda item)

  • Schema updates
  • TCK status
  • Working on Platform/Profile spec PRs
    • Core Profile almost ready
    • Platform TCK User Guides need to be updated
      • Issues have been created, but there may be some areas not created issue for
    • PRs to be created tomorrow
      • All: Review staged docs and artifacts and TCK user guide
  • Security TCK missing PDF userguide
    • Ballot ongoing
    • Bring it up with the spec committee tomorrow
    • One option is to respin this ballot with the new TCK zip/SHA256

jQA dependency analysis

  • https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-api/issues/125
    • Cyclic dependency between CDI and Transactions
    • Test dependencies on APIs
    • Platform Web-API
    • JMS
    • CDI - will remove Transactions/EJB javadoc dependencies
    • Faces
    • EJB
    • Resource
  • Discussion
    • Is a course grained maven deps analysis like this useful?
    • Platform and Profiles define which level of component specifications that it is composed from
    • Transitive dependencies are not that important in this context
    • Is it a problem that Transactions pulls in CDI 3.0 (provided)?
      • Transactions runs fine with CDI 4.0, so this will be solved when
    • DECISION: We will NOT do a new release of Transactions for EE 10

Back to the top