Jakarta EE Platform Call

Date: 2022-08-23

Present:

Jared Anderson(IBM)
BJ Hargrave (IBM)
Emily Jiang (IBM)
Nathan Rauh (IBM)
Thomas Watson (IBM)
Ivar Grimstad (Eclipse Foundation)
James Perkins (Red Hat)
John Clingan (Red Hat)
Brian Stansberry (Red Hat)
Cesar Hernandez (Tomitribe)
Scott Marlow (Red Hat)
Scott Stark (Red Hat)
Tanja Obradovic (Eclipse Foundation)
Lukas Jungmann (Oracle)
Kenji Kazumura (Fujitsu)

Agenda and Minutes

Jakarta EE 10 Status (standing agenda item)

Core profile ballot complete
Web profile and Full platform waiting on steps outlined by Ed
- https://www.eclipse.org/lists/jakartaee-platform-dev/msg03663.html
- Final concurrency TCK
  - Is this the latest? https://download.eclipse.org/ee4j/cu/jakartaee10/staged/eftl/concurrency-tck-3.0.2.zip
- CCRs for Web Profile and Full Platform
  - TCKs currently running against GlassFish 7.0.0-nightly
    - https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-tck/wiki/Jakarta-EE-10.0-TCK-results
  - GlassFish 7.0.0.M7 pass everything except Concurrency.
  - Running M7 against Concurrency TCK 3.0.2 enough?
  - GlassFish 7.0.0.M7 must be verified against the staged Platform- and Web Profile TCK and CCR updated with the corresponding SHA256 since it has evolved since the original run
  - GlassFish 7.0.0.M8 will be released and used in the complete test runs
  - The Concurrency TCK 3.0.2 must be promoted by the spec committee. Will be done as soon as the Concurrency project has created a PR with the new link to update the spec page.
    - Arjan will create a PR
      - Include link to 3.0.2
      - Update CCR/Test results for GlassFish (verify those for TCKs that are changed)
        
        Concurrency + Platform

Handling of Platform CCRs

Do we really need one CCR per Java version?
CCRs are approved by lazy consensus after 14 days
If a faster resolution is required (e.g. due to product announcements), ping a committer to take a look at it
Suggestion to make this a standing item on the agenda of this call

Back to the top