Skip to main content
Breadcrumbs
Date: 2022-10-11
Present:
- Jared Anderson (IBM)
- Brian Decker (IBM)
- BJ Hargrave (IBM)
- Emily Jiang (IBM)
- Nathan Rauh (IBM)
- Tom Watson (IBM)
- Ivar Grimstad (Eclipse Foundation)
- Jan Westerkamp (iJUG)
- John Clingan (Red Hat)
- Scott Marlow (Red Hat)
- César Hernández (Tomitribe)
- Werner Keil (Individual/Ambassador)
- Petr Aubrecht (Payara)
- Nathan Erwin (Individual)
- Brian Stansberry (Red Hat)
- Ed Bratt (Oracle)
- Dmitry Kornilov (Oracle)
- Kenji Kazumura (Fujitsu)
Agenda and Minutes
[Emily] JPMS required for Jakarta Activation and Jakarta Mail even though Jakarta EE clearly documented that it is optional
- https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1pFOqM4ykjQSQ78UrXqXLlu6e9WgZ7Flzp9kU4AW-4sc/edit
- Usage vs requirement for features
- Please provide feedback on the poll questions.
- Plan to send out the poll after next call
- On 10.1 question, if security manager is removed from TCK tests, that only helps on JVMs (or implementations) using lazy classloaders (otherwise CNFEs may occur for security manager spec api).
- Can we get clarity on how the Security Manager will actually be removed? E.g. replaced with no-ops etc.
Jakarta EE. Next further discussion
Back to the top