Skip to main content
Breadcrumbs
Date: 2023-02-14
Present:
- Lenny Primak (Individual)
- Jared Anderson (IBM)
- Emily Jiang (IBM)
- Jim Krueger (IBM)
- Nathan Rauh (IBM)
- Tom Watson (IBM)
- Jan Westerkamp (iJUG)
- Petr Aubrecht (Payara)
- David Matejcek (OmniFish)
- Jesse McConnell (Webtide)
- Ed Bratt (Oracle)
- Ed Burns (Microsoft)
- Nathan Erwin (Individual)
- Hendre Louw (Individual)
- Cesar Hernandez (Tomitribe)
- Tanja Obradovic (Eclipse Foundation)
Agenda and Minutes
Jakarta EE 11 Release Planning
- Project Lead Survey request form: Spec leads: please fill in the form asap
- New email sent to spec leads list to request input asap
- Project Lead Survey responses
- How to get more responses?
- Release Plan DRAFT
Application Client Container (from last call)
- Is this still relevant?
- Mark as deprecated in Jakarta EE 11 and then remove it in Jakarta EE 12?
- Deprecate in Jakarta EE 11 and document the better technology such as using Rest Client etc.
- Open an issue on jakarta platform to document this and track user feedback
- Running EJB code on the client side. As EJB is not that important any more because of CDI, we should consider marking it as deprecated.
- Application client is used to access remote service, does CDI offer the same?
- No but CDI does not do the remote call.
- Scott will take a look at this issue
- Ed will investigate this.
Any data of adopting Jakarta EE 10
- Check with vendors
- Use Jakarta EE survey to find out
- Support of the Java SE level availability
- Support from one system with all kinds of dependencies brings complication
- Promote the latest releases
- Green field project might be a good fit to use Jakarta EE 10
- Jakarta EE starters and advocacies
- Conference talks on migrating from Jakarta EE 8 to EE 10
- Security is one of the drivers to move up but Jakarta EE might not fit in this category.
Back to the top