Jakarta EE Platform Call

Date: 2025-04-15
Present:

• Ed Burns (MSFT)
• Jared Anderson (IBM)
• Kyle Aure (IBM)
• Ashwin M S (IBM)
• Chithra Mini (IBM)
• Anand N K (IBM)
• Nathan Rauh (IBM)
• Jan Westerkamp (iJUG)
• Lukas Jungmann (Oracle)
• Scott Marlow (Red Hat)
• Ivar Grimstad (Eclipse Foundation)
• Dmitry Kornilov (Oracle)
• John Clingan (Red Hat)
• Kenji Kazumura (Fujitsu)

Top of mind for Ed, Arjan, Jared

• [BALLOT] CoreProfileWebProfile please cast your votes. Ballot closes at COB Friday 2025-04-18.
• HTTP/3 https://github.com/jakartaee/platform/issues/1038 (e.g. this is about how the HTTP client interacts with the server using HTTP/3)
  • Specification assertion approaches.
    • Push it down to the component spec level.
      • Servlet.
      • REST.
      • HTTP
    • State it at the platform level, including a TCK test.
    • We must also plan for this to be dealt with separately from the Jakarta HTTP proposal. https://github.com/jakartaee/platform/issues/673
    • Leave to be defined as a vendor concern.
  • There is a JEP for HTTP/3 Client https://openjdk.org/jeps/8291976
• Marlow: TCK assertion approaches which may have been mentioned above?
  • https://github.com/jakartaee/platform-tck/issues/2006 is for `Introduce TCK AssertionId annotation` to provide a way to specify test assertions in TCK tests.

TCK Refactoring Jakarta EE 11

• Jakarta EE 11 Platform release
  • Tentative schedule thoughts
    • April 30 TCK complete
    • May 15 CCR created and mentor review start
    • May 19 start ballot (complete 7 to 14 days)
• Copied from last week
  • TCK persistence tests failing for EJB runs
  • Some component TCKs aren’t started yet
  • Jobs / runners need some updating for the new style of running
  • Connector failures need to be looked at
• https://github.com/jakartaee/platform/issues/1056 opened that needs to be discussed

Jakarta EE 12

• Plan review ballot status https://github.com/orgs/jakartaee/projects/17
• Note: Jakarta Config does not need a “plan review”, so it is not on the board. It does need a “progress review” to accommodate the Config aspect of “Host MicroProfile at Jakarta”.
  https://jakarta.ee/specifications/config/1.0/
• Jakarta HTTP
  • Mailing list communication to platform, rest and servlet hasn’t happened yet
• Review of Platform and Profile release plans to send to mentor
  • Core Profile
  • Web Profile
  • Platform
• Review where components specs are on the board
• Marlow: Can we work on getting more involvement with running EE Specifications?
  • We have spec leads that are still leading multiple EE Specifications. Can we work on process to improve the situation to encourage others to step up and help?